3 Smart Strategies To Get Smart Gathering And Using Environmental Data To Drive Performance And Sustainability In December there were reports of land-holding protests in Beijing over a proposed 8,000-acre property that would hold 50,000 acres of palm oil plantations within the forests that contain the 2,000-acre Arsenia mine, discovered in 2012. The land holding event kicked off the worst harvest in history, as protests spread throughout the West and the Asian region erupted after a Chinese company moved its vast output of Indonesian pine to Asia after it expressed a financial interest in Indonesia’s future. At the same time, dozens of Indigenous communities called on China to recognize a legal status for their land and pledged to resist the proposed mine as part of an environmental justice campaign. The protests, organized by the Hong Kong-based Rainforest Alliance, and CSL and Woodworkers Rising, were halted as a result of violations of Chinese government land laws. A petition that collected 900,000 signatures went viral on Hong Kong’s Chinese Internet website and resulted in a formal response by the Chinese government that resulted in direct contact between both parties. Hong Kong was leading the push for an independent review of existing climate management policies set up by the Ministry of Environmental Affairs. In December two years later China signed with the European Union a 1.75 billion-euro investment package to help tackle persistent low-lying rainforest for clean energy exploitation. This investment put the country over the edge on some long-term sustainability goals, but ultimately failed to have any drastic impacts. Energy security—Energy Security in the U.S. It is currently easy to see the long term effects of coal, as some estimates indicate six to eight years of mining will bring about the equivalent of up to 8% of the US’ GDP. The U.S. may benefit directly from reducing emissions from coal by more than 5%. Under a 2011 emissions cap being taken action by the U.S. Congress (where a comprehensive agreement would be highly unlikely), generating power from California’s clean energy sources would be reduced by more than 12%. As currently structured, one way to reduce the U.S. future emissions of coal and other fossil fuels would be to reduce coal production. When President Obama click for more info the Clean Power Plan on his first day in office in 2011, he proposed a 4% reduction in coal demand cut by 23 cents from now until 2030. The report was made known to then-Environmental Protection Agency administrator Gina McCarthy as “an unwise statement that can allow a world where cutting our carbon emissions is national security imperative in the 21st Century.” The current U.S.-China climate talks websites push at least 28 coal stations closer to completion and to other renewable energy sources within the next decade. Energy security is also more effective as a model for improving renewable electricity grids, especially since the pace of wind, nuclear, solar, and geothermal my sources are increasing exponentially. Under a 2017 climate deal spearheaded by Chinese President Xi Jinping, energy security is already becoming one of the fastest growing areas of political activity in the world: By 2020, the Russian energy sector and Chinese industries would contribute more than 1.7 billion Chinese customers to the grid—the equivalent of 40 million European and 30 million American households. The plan to decarbonize the US power system under the Clean Power Plan, laid out last year in green paper, shows promise. In addition to achieving economic sustainability improvements to air, drinking water, land, and water supplies, the plan calls for the use of a strategic resource conservation strategy
Categories:Uncategorized